Stop wasting clicks.

I’ve been reviewing a lot of content data over the last year. Engagement, scroll depth, return visits, and assisted conversions.

One pattern keeps showing up.

Pages rank. Traffic holds. But readers don’t stay.

Google now shows summaries and expanded previews for a large share of informational queries. By the time someone opens an article, they already understand the topic at a basic level. Instead of landing on the page, users are arriving with a selective mindset.

That puts pressure on the opening paragraph. And most openings aren’t built for that environment.

They still explain what the topic is. They still restate the headline. They still take time to ‘set context.’ That time no longer exists.

Reader behavior has been consistent for years. The difference now is how early those decisions happen.

Chartbeat data shows that more than half of website visitors spend under 15 seconds actively on a page. That number hasn’t improved with better design or faster pages. It’s stable. Which is a short timeframe to grab attention.

Nielsen Norman Group research continues to show that users read roughly 20% of the words on an average page, and most of that attention is above the first scroll.

When Google shows summaries or extracted answers, users click less often, and when they do click, they arrive with intent already formed. Pew’s analysis showed that traditional organic results received nearly half the click rate on queries where summaries were present compared to those without.

That means fewer clicks and higher expectations per click.

If the opening paragraph doesn’t deliver something useful immediately, users leave. Not because the content is bad. Because it failed to justify itself.

The problem isn’t summaries themselves, it’s habit.

Most intros are written to orient the reader. They explain why the topic matters or what the article will cover. That approach assumes the reader needs onboarding in a standalone environment.

In 2026, they don’t.

The reader already saw the topic, the context, and often the key facts before clicking. Repeating that information doesn’t add value. It just shows them that the article is unlikely to go deeper and will require more manual searching, almost going through a reverse process.

This is why engagement drops even when rankings remain stable. The content technically answers the query, but it doesn’t anticipate the value for the informed reader.

Strong intros do one thing well. They change the reader’s understanding or decision within the first few sentences.

That usually takes one of four forms:

What they don’t do is explain the topic.

Here is the difference:

An opening that says, “B2B SaaS is getting harder, and marketing teams need to adapt,” tells the reader nothing they didn’t already know.

An opening that says, “Your demo conversion rate didn’t drop because people stopped caring. It dropped because the first screen of your pricing page makes them do math. Put the plan fit in plain language above the fold, add one example customer, and you will stop bleeding qualified traffic before the form,” tells the reader exactly what to fix.

If I were responsible for content performance in 2026, I wouldn’t rewrite everything. I would isolate the problem.

Start with ten pages that influence revenue or leads in some way. Not traffic leaders. Business-impact pages.

For each page, look at:

Then rewrite only the opening paragraph.

Here are three examples of changes that consistently improve engagement.

Before: “This article explains how AI summaries affect content visibility.”

After: “When summaries appear, fewer people click. On pages where they do click, vague intros lose readers fast. This article shows how to rewrite openings so the click isn’t wasted.”

Before: “Email attribution is becoming more complex.”

After: “If you still rely on last-click email attribution, your reports are overstating performance. Here’s how teams are adjusting measurement in 2025.”

Before: “Content engagement is harder to earn.”

After: “More than half of readers leave within 15 seconds. If your opening doesn’t deliver value immediately, they won’t see the rest.”

Run those tests for two weeks. Do not change anything else. If engagement improves, you have your answer.

This approach aligns with how people actually read.

Readers scan the first screen and decide whether the page is worth their time. When the opening delivers something concrete, they stay. When it delays, they leave.

Search engines increasingly reflect that behavior. Engagement signals now link more strongly with ranking stability than keyword coverage.

Better openings don’t guarantee higher rankings. But weak ones reliably suppress performance.

I don’t think content is getting harder. I think tolerance for wasted words is disappearing.

The first paragraph has always been important to capture a user’s attention, but now things have changed. Drop the BS and deliver some value up front.

I have a goal to hit 10,000 subs this year, if you find value in these emails, please share or subscribe if you haven’t.